Chris, Daniel, I don't suppose there's any chance of CXF introducing a configurable option to use non-conforming (but more reasonable IMHO) default parameter names? Am I the only one that sees the default parameter names as something akin to obfuscation of the WSDL file? I've sent a comment to the JSR224 email address but I doubt anything will come of it.
Thanks, Corey On 7/25/07, Christopher Moesel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Corey, As you've probably seen in the reply from Dan K., the JAX-WS specification states that the default should be "argN" where N is replaced with the zero-based argument index. CXF is compliant with the JAX-WS spec, so it looks like you've found a mistake in the CXF documentation. Thanks for pointing this out-- I'll fix the documentation to eliminate the confusion. -Chris
