Thanks, Benson.  I was using Axis WSDL2Java through the Web Services plugin
for IntelliJ.  When I generated my proxies through CXF WSDL2Java, my
problems went away.

Thanks,
Drew

On 9/7/07, Benson Margulies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I thought 2.0.1 was good enough. Could you please send more details? Are
> you using the CXF wsdl2java or someone elses? What error do you get?
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Drew Hite [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Friday, September 07, 2007 9:26 AM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: returning tabular data from a webmethod
> >
> > 2.0.1.  Do you recommend moving to a snapshot build?
> >
> > On 9/7/07, Benson Margulies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > What version do you have? Nested arrays were not feeling too swift
> in
> > > 2.0.
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Drew Hite [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Sent: Friday, September 07, 2007 9:07 AM
> > > > To: [email protected]
> > > > Subject: returning tabular data from a webmethod
> > > >
> > > > Hello,
> > > > I started using CXF a few days ago, and I'm trying to implement a
> > > "Java
> > > > first" web service.  I created the web service in the "Spring way"
> as
> > > > outlined here:
> > > >
> http://cwiki.apache.org/CXF20DOC/writing-a-service-with-spring.html
> > > and I
> > > > generated the client using WSDL2Java.  I would like one of the
> methods
> > > to
> > > > return data in a manner similar to java.sql.Resultset with rows
> and
> > > > columns.  I've tried making the return type String[][] and also
> > > > List<String[]>, but in both instances I get errors when I test
> using
> > > the
> > > > WSDL2Java generated proxies. Delimiting each column with a special
> > > > character
> > > > like a pipe and returning a String[] does work, but I would like
> to
> > > return
> > > > the data in a more structured format.  Is there a tried and true
> way
> > > for
> > > > returning data returned from a database query for a CXF web
> service?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Drew
> > >
>

Reply via email to