Eric,
Do you mind posting a complete example. May be we can have a very
constructive discussions based on that. 

Thanks
Matt




BigEHokie wrote:
> 
> Dan,
> 
> What sort of solution are you looking for?  We are using an
> Acegi/Spring/CXF implementation at our company where we are using
> WS-Security and Acegi for authentication and AOP/Acegi for
> authorization.  We could be interested in contributing.
> 
> Thanks,
> Eric
> 
> 
> On Tue, 2007-09-18 at 00:15 +0200, Dan Diephouse wrote:
>> And I want somebody to contribute a cleaner solution :-D
>> 
>> I know there is a lot of stuff we could do with Spring Security/Acegi
>> that would be super cool. It'd be a real low barrier way to contribute
>> some stuff if anyone is interested.
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> - Dan
>> 
>> mattmadhavan wrote: 
>> > Hi Ray,
>> > No I do not want the client side to tell the server! Thats my point.
>> Some
>> > good blogs I have seen, do that! Where the client 'tells' which handler
>> to
>> > use!
>> > 
>> > I want a cleaner ACEGI+ XFIRE solution!
>> > 
>> > Thanks
>> > Matt
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > Ray Krueger wrote:
>> >   
>> > > You want the client to tell the server how to do security? That
>> sounds
>> > > crazy :)
>> > > 
>> > > Your client side should either be doing http based security or
>> > > ws-security. That doesn't have anything to do with Acegi at that
>> > > point.
>> > > 
>> > > On 9/14/07, Zarar Siddiqi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > >     
>> > > > I'm trying to understand what you're saying but am having
>> difficulty. But
>> > > > here goes:
>> > > > 
>> > > >       
>> > > > > Can some one point me to some docs on the CXF and ACEGI
>> integration
>> > > > > or CXF and security like authentication and authorization.
>> > > > >         
>> > > > I use Acegi for authorization purposes only. IMHO it doesn't really
>> make
>> > > > sense for authentication (WS-Security can do that).  So I use the
>> > > > MethodSecurityInterceptor and BeanNameAutoProxyCreator to manage
>> calls to
>> > > > my
>> > > > service level methods.  The Acegi docs can help you there, the only
>> > > > difference I think is that you have to set the authentication token
>> > > > yourself, e.g.:
>> > > > 
>> > > > UsernamePasswordAuthenticationToken token = new
>> > > > UsernamePasswordAuthenticationToken(
>> > > >    user.getUsername(), user.getPassword(), user.getAuthorities());
>> > > > // Populate Acegi Security Context
>> > > > SecurityContextHolder.getContext().setAuthentication(token);
>> > > > 
>> > > >       
>> > > > > I found some blogs on the CXF+ACEGI, but it is Java centric. On
>> the
>> > > > >         
>> > > > client
>> > > >       
>> > > > > side
>> > > > > we need to set the which class handles the security on the Server
>> side!
>> > > > > But if
>> > > > > I am using some other language for clients like C# it doesn't
>> seem to
>> > > > >         
>> > > > be
>> > > >       
>> > > > > the proper way!
>> > > > >         
>> > > > You can pass the class name which handles security to the server
>> (crazy
>> > > > thought I think!) using a header element and then parse it using
>> CXF
>> > > > interceptors.
>> > > > 
>> > > > Zarar
>> > > > 
>> > > > 
>> > > > 
>> > > > 
>> > > > mattmadhavan wrote:
>> > > >       
>> > > > > Any Help will be appreciated!
>> > > > > 
>> > > > > 
>> > > > > 
>> > > > > mattmadhavan wrote:
>> > > > >         
>> > > > > > Hello,
>> > > > > > Can some one point me to some docs on the CXF and ACEGI
>> integration or
>> > > > > > CXF and security like authentication and authorization. Some
>> sample
>> > > > > >           
>> > > > app
>> > > >       
>> > > > > > will even be great.
>> > > > > > 
>> > > > > > I found some blogs on the CXF+ACEGI, but it is Java centric. On
>> the
>> > > > > > client side we need to set the which class handles the security
>> on the
>> > > > > > Server side! But if I am using some other language for clients
>> like C#
>> > > > > >           
>> > > > it
>> > > >       
>> > > > > > does n't seem to be the proper way!
>> > > > > > 
>> > > > > > Any ideas will be greatly appreciated.
>> > > > > > 
>> > > > > > Thanks
>> > > > > > Matt
>> > > > > > 
>> > > > > >           
>> > > > --
>> > > > View this message in context:
>> > > > http://www.nabble.com/CXF%2BACEGI-tf4436973.html#a12677582
>> > > > Sent from the cxf-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>> > > > 
>> > > > 
>> > > >       
>> > 
>> >   
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Dan Diephouse
>> MuleSource
>> http://mulesource.com | http://netzooid.com/blog
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/CXF%2BACEGI-tf4436973.html#a12759141
Sent from the cxf-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Reply via email to