Well, looking at the Dynamic Client you would appear to be losing your
compile-time checks at the least. But it was the premise for which he
was trying to use DynamicClient to begin with ("To relieve me from
generating service interfaces") that I was questioning. I got the
impression that the user had not much experience with wsdl2java, and as
a result, was overestimating the tool's difficulty.
Glen
Am Samstag, den 01.12.2007, 11:23 +0800 schrieb tog:
> Btw, conceptually it is the same: one is embedded in the other. Am I wrong ?
>
> On Dec 1, 2007 8:29 AM, Glen Mazza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Am Donnerstag, den 29.11.2007, 14:46 -0800 schrieb Alexandre Gazola:
> > > Hello guys,
> > >
> > > I´m starting to develop with webservices... I would like to start with
> > > a simple call to a WS, given that I have the WSDL url. To relieve me
> > > from generating service interfaces, I´m trying to use a DynamicClient
> > > (as shown in http://xfire.codehaus.org/Dynamic+Client ).
> >
> > Really? If you already have the WSDL, code generation is *much* easier
> > (and more accurate) than Dynamic Clients IMO. Here are Ant[1] and
> > Maven[2] based options for you.
> >
> > HTH,
> > Glen
> >
> > [1] http://www.jroller.com/gmazza/date/20070929
> > [2] http://www.jroller.com/gmazza/date/20071129
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
