Benson Margulies wrote:
On Thu, 2008-01-24 at 13:05 -0500, Frederick N. Brier wrote:
I reread my own posting and realized that the problem is not in the
detail element, but in the <faultcode> element which contains an
arbitrary string, "ServerFaultCode", not a QName. The exception says:
"No NamespaceURI, SOAP requires faultcode content to be a QName"
I believe the faultcode element and QName requirement was introduced
with SOAP 1.1. Can CXF be forced to validate using SOAP 1.0? If so,
how? What are the ramifications? I checked the schemas specified in
the WSDL document and they appear to be SOAP 1.0. Why didn't CXF
automatically use same SOAP 1.0 schemas as were defined in the WSDL
document?
The errors comes out of the SAAJ component, doesn't it?
Yes.
