Hi Brad, I've tried this with JAX-B generated java classes and it works fine. Drop me a mail if you want further details on how to configure maven etc.
Barry On Feb 19, 2008 4:04 PM, Sergey Beryozkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Brad > > > I prefer the XML first approach and would like to build a RESTful > > service which either can use my already generated XMLBeans classes > > (prefered option) or generate JAXB java binding classes from my > > schema. > > No problems for a JAXB option, it should work just fine. CXF > JAXBElementProvider checks if @XMLRootAnnotation is present. > Fox XMLBeans, a simple custom provider would need to be added. Perhaps we > should have it supported by default. Barry has added a system test showing > how to write a JSON BadgerFish JAX-RS Provider (I was actually very > surprised to find out BadgerFish is a real thing which lives in the Jettison > project) > > Cheers, Sergey > > > > Hi, > > > > I'm interested in using the jax-rs support in CXF. From the examples > > I've seen it appears that I'm required to take that Java first > > approach and let JAXB take care of the Java to XML mapping. Is this > > correct? > > > > I prefer the XML first approach and would like to build a RESTful > > service which either can use my already generated XMLBeans classes > > (prefered option) or generate JAXB java binding classes from my > > schema. > > > > Is this possible? The important things here for me are to have the > > schema dictate what the XML looks like and to have it as a REST > > service. If its not possible using JAX-RS, does CXF have an > > alternative method to achieve the desired results? > > > > Thanks, > > Brad. > > ---------------------------- > IONA Technologies PLC (registered in Ireland) > Registered Number: 171387 > Registered Address: The IONA Building, Shelbourne Road, Dublin 4, Ireland >
