hi glen,

Glen Mazza wrote:
Server faults go into separate interceptor chains (second paragraph of
[1])--I have not done this before, but you should be able to reuse the
interceptors you have on your normal non-error chains for the error
situations.

so you mean the FAULT chain? i've added my interceptor everywhere but AFAIR the fault chain interceptors are not invoked and all interceptors in the IN chain stop after the READ phase (in case of the server fault)

-Florian

[1] http://cwiki.apache.org/CXF20DOC/interceptors.html

Am Mittwoch, den 09.04.2008, 11:14 +0200 schrieb Florian Rosenberg:
hi all,

I'm writing a automated system for monitoring certain quality of service properties (e.g., response time, etc) from a client-side perspective. this works quite well as long as no fault occur on the service provider that i'm trying to invoke. I use a couple of interceptors in the IN and OUT chains to achieve it.

in case of a fault that occurs on the server, I need to be aware of this fault at the client side (e.g., I need to log the fault message etc into a database).

the problem I'm struggling with it the following: if a fault occurs on the server my incoming interceptor chain at the client side is not processed to the latest phase where I have my interceptor that stores all the stuff into the database. the interceptor chain stops after the READ phase on my client (thats what I could see in the debugger).

I've experimented a bit with a simple interceptor that just dumps a message to the console upon calling handleMessage() and handleFault(). I've added to every phase in the IN and FAULT chain, nevertheless handleFault() is never called upon receiving a fault message from the server.

could someone please clarify how faults from the server can be handled in the client-side interceptor chains (i'm using cxf v2.05)?

thanks,
-Florian



--
Florian Rosenberg
Research Assistant
Distributed Systems Group
Technical University Vienna, Austria
tel: +43 1 58801 18418
fax: +43 1 58801 18491
www.florianrosenberg.com

"keep in mind that my knowledge of the issues is very limited, fragmented and quite possibly completely wrong" A.S.

Reply via email to