Honestly, my first thought is to hope that Thomas from JBoss, who has been
posting a lot of traffic on the dev list, might be able to help you.
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 5:42 PM, jm1468 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> We have found a way to reproduce it. We are using JBoss 4.2 and CXF
> 2.0.3.
>
> When JBoss is starting, if a client {java or .net} attempts to connect to
> the webservice before the JBoss server is completely up and servicing the
> webservice, the exception will be thrown after JBoss displays it's started
> successfully message. Now it's looking more like a JBoss problem than a
> CXF
> problem. Any thoughts?
>
> Thanks,
> Jason
>
>
>
> dkulp wrote:
> >
> > On Friday 04 April 2008, Daniel Kulp wrote:
> >> On Thursday 03 April 2008, jm1468 wrote:
> >> > ...
> >> > WARNING: org.apache.cxf.transport.http.WSDLQueryHandler Exception
> >> > caught writing response: Failed to configure TRaX
> >> > .......
> >> >org.apache.cxf.interceptor.Fault: No such operation
> >>
> >> Ick.. there are several things wrong that I need to dig into quite a
> >> bit more:
> >>
> >> 1) The WSDLQueryHandler is throwing the above exception. However, we
> >> only log the basic "getMessage()" thing and not the full stack trace
> >> that would indicate any internal "cause" exceptions and stuff that
> >> would actually help to diagnose it.
> >>
> >> 2) If an exception is thrown, wrather than returning an error to the
> >> client like "error generating wsdl", we try to dispatch the request
> >> into the interceptor chains like its a service invokation. Since it
> >> doesn't look like a normal request, it doesn't find an operaion.
> >>
> >> I'm going to fix both of those. It most likely won't fix your problem
> >> as it's having problems creating a transformer, but it MAY at least
> >> provide a better indication of WHY it's not working.
> >
> > Actually, I'm going to go one furthur and change from using a
> transformer
> > to write the wsdl out to using our Stax based writers. Since Stax HAS
> > to work for pretty much anything in CXF to work, that should be a bit
> > more reliable. :-) It may be a bit quicker as well.
> >
> >
> > --
> > J. Daniel Kulp
> > Principal Engineer, IONA
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > http://www.dankulp.com/blog
> >
> >
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/I-have-the-TRaX%2C-can-you-help--tp16455965p16597540.html
> Sent from the cxf-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
