Sounds good for us. Thank you

Srinivas

On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 5:35 PM, Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>
> I would say Monday.   It's normally 72 hours for the vote, but that
> places it on the weekend.  My "honey do" list is already too long for
> the weekend so I probably won't get to do the uploads and syncs and
> stuff till Monday.
>
> Dan
>
> On Tuesday 22 April 2008, Vasu Modekurti wrote:
> > Dan,
> > Thank you very much for the quick response. What could be a possible
> > date for official release after tomorrow's build, provided no road
> > blocks.
> >
> > Srinivas
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 5:27 PM, Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > If things go well with the TCK's and stuff tonight, I'll be doing
> > > the build tomorrow.  Then the vote for a few days....
> > >
> > > Dan
> > >
> > > On Tuesday 22 April 2008, smodekurti wrote:
> > > > Hi there,
> > > > I belong to the enterprise architecture team of a large retail
> > > > corporation. We are in the process of adopting a jax-ws stack for
> > > > our Web Services implementation. After comparing the features
> > > > offered by different stacks, we have decided to go with CXF. But
> > > > some of the features that we wanted to implement in our framework
> > > > would need cxf 2.1 runtime which I believe is not stable yet. Is
> > > > there any defined date that you are looking at to release 2.1. We
> > > > would love to use CXF provide we are able to get a stable release
> > > > for 2.1 at the earliest.
> > > >
> > > > Srinivas
> > >
> > > --
> > > J. Daniel Kulp
> > > Principal Engineer, IONA
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > http://www.dankulp.com/blog
>
>
>
> --
> J. Daniel Kulp
> Principal Engineer, IONA
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.dankulp.com/blog
>

Reply via email to