On 05/07/2014 03:11 AM, Richard Smith wrote:
I think it would be *extremely* surprising if we implicitly added a call to a function that is deleted or inaccessible, that the original code didn't call. What alternative do you suggest?
It seems to me that for a trivially copyable class, copying doesn't need to be modeled as a call at all.
Jason _______________________________________________ cxx-abi-dev mailing list [email protected] http://sourcerytools.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cxx-abi-dev
