>From: John McCall <[email protected]>
>Oh, yes, that’s definitely a language requirement: you can’t outright reject
>this construct if it’s not potentially-evaluated.  A lot of template
>metaprogramming tricks rely on overloads like this.  But it doesn’t affect
>whether you consider it undefined behavior when it *isn’t* potentially
>evaluated.

It turns out we fixed the compiler long ago to not warn for sizeof.
So that leaves me with no bug test cases of a customer using it.
But that's only negative evidence.
_______________________________________________
cxx-abi-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://sourcerytools.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cxx-abi-dev

Reply via email to