>From: =?UTF-8?Q?Rafael_Esp=C3=ADndola?= <[email protected]> >The attached patch updates the ABI to document how gcc uses the C5 and >D5 comdats to group constructors and destructors.
Hmm, I thought aC++ had C5/D5 entry points added at one time but I no longer see them. Each constructor/destructor variant is in its own comdat. Index: 204 Directory Section Name: foo::foo()(allocating)[_ZN3fooC3Ev] Index: 205 Directory Section Name: foo::~foo()(base)[_ZN3fooD2Ev] Index: 206 Directory Section Name: foo::~foo()(deallocating)[_ZN3fooD0Ev] Index: 207 Directory Section Name: foo::~foo()(complete)[_ZN3fooD1Ev] Index: 208 Directory Section Name: bar::bar()(allocating)[_ZN3barC3Ev] Index: 209 Directory Section Name: bar::~bar()(base)[_ZN3barD2Ev] Index: 210 Directory Section Name: bar::~bar()(deallocating)[_ZN3barD0Ev] Index: 211 Directory Section Name: bar::~bar()(complete)[_ZN3barD1Ev] Index: 213 Directory Section Name: bar::barf()[_ZN3bar4barfEv] Index: 214 Directory Section Name: foo::barf()[_ZN3foo4barfEv] >implementation can choose to group the constructors and destructors, >but if it chooses to use C5/D5, then it must put the same symbols in >them as gcc does. Rafael Yes. _______________________________________________ cxx-abi-dev mailing list [email protected] http://sourcerytools.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cxx-abi-dev
