On 6 May 2015 at 07:57, Jason Merrill <[email protected]> wrote: > On 05/06/2015 08:49 AM, Richard Smith wrote: > >> The reason we chose Ua rather than U was that the ABI suggests that U4blah >> should demangle as 'blah', whereas we want something that demanglers know >> should become '__attribute__((blah))'. I have no particular strong >> feelings >> here. >> > > Hmm, I don't think this is a useful distinction; what matters is the > calling convention, not whether it was written with a GNU __attribute, a > C++11 [[attribute]], a decl-specifier, or whatever.
The idea was to scope them, so Ua would be for attributes and we'd still have room for Uc for calling conventions if we want some day. > > Jason > > _______________________________________________ > cxx-abi-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://sourcerytools.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cxx-abi-dev >
_______________________________________________ cxx-abi-dev mailing list [email protected] http://sourcerytools.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cxx-abi-dev
