> On Feb 11, 2016, at 2:06 PM, Richard Smith <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On 11 February 2016 at 07:43, David Vandevoorde <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> A proposal for coroutine support is making its way through the C++ committee.
> Here is the latest public document:
>
> http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2015/p0057r1.pdf
> <http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2015/p0057r1.pdf>
>
> It includes a new “operator co_await” that will require mangling when
> supported.
>
> How about reserving the operator code “aw” for it?
>
> I.e., once standardized or TS'd, we’d add a production to <operator-name>:
>
> <operator-name> ::= nw # new
> ...
> ::= aw # co_await (unary)
> ...
>
> I agree, see
> http://sourcerytools.com/pipermail/cxx-abi-dev/2015-October/002868.html
> <http://sourcerytools.com/pipermail/cxx-abi-dev/2015-October/002868.html> =)
Ha! I apparently filed that away without reading it :-P Sorry.
Daveed
_______________________________________________
cxx-abi-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://sourcerytools.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cxx-abi-dev
