I find CB the best thing since sliced bread, as we used to say in the UK. However, I have just started to play with the BPA crowd. They are truly concerned with "cheating"! So they insist on our using ACTS as well as CB. Now that seems a waste to me. I can see how some unscrupulous character could fudge die rolls, but why do we have to cater for that. My wish for CB would be to have a similar function for die rolling that ACTS has to counter such activity. Clearly this is nothing to do with open architecture software, but would greatly improve matters.
_____ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2007 1:15 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [CBML] Re: Announcement: CyberBoard... A Change of Direction (A bit windy. Gentlefolk, My ignorance of all things programming as a given, i'm still inclined to agree with Mr. Ander (hope that's correct Jim). The only thing CyB has ever really been "missing" is the live-play element. And when one considers its comparative accessibility from the design standpoint {SNIP} Either way good luck and God speed to all who endeavor. -S- Murmurs of "Hear Hear" and "Quite Right" from the back benchers. Dave Tanner ************************************** See what's free at http://www.aol. <http://www.aol.com.> com. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
