From:   Bill Hoath, [EMAIL PROTECTED]

In view of the recent murmurs about more regulation of air rifles etc I
thought it might be interesting to follow up what happened after a high
profile local incident. Those in England with a good memory may recall
that it got two or three minutes TV coverage at the start of the BBC
national news that evening. The extracts reproduced below are from the
website of the local newspaper "The Gloucester Citizen" and their
copyright is acknowledged.

A quick scan of "Gun Law" Sixth Edition (Godfrey Sandys-Winsch -
published by Shaw & Sons ISBN 0 7219 0364 9 Price UKP 19.95 published
July 1999) suggests some other offences that they might also have been
charged with (I can't be bothered to type them up, but anyone in the UK
could do a lot worse than getting their own copy of the book which is
stocked by the NSRA)

Any comments on the eventual outcome?  
  
======================================================================== 

29th April 1999

Students in college shooting terror
 
Gloucester college students fled in terror when a gun-wielding youth
fired shots through the classroom window. The incident just before 11am
on Thursday caused panic in a beauty therapy class containing 18 female
students and a lecturer at the college in Brunswick Road. As armed
police and dog handlers rushed to the scene, the police helicopter was
scrambled for a huge search of the city centre. Later the college was
evacuated and over 1,000 students and staff were led to safety.

Police say the gunman fired three shots and the students in the BTec
class, aged between 16 and 19, were "shaken but unhurt". The gunman was
spotted fleeing towards Greyfriars. He was thought to be carrying a
black handgun. The immediate area around the college was sealed off and
scenes of crime officers moved in. At 1.13pm armed police brought a
handcuffed youth out of the college building.

Police spokeswoman Ruth McDonagh said: "Fortunately no-one was hurt. The
college class was evacuated and armed police were brought in. "The
caller from the college who raised the alarm described the man as white,
about 17 years old, five feet seven inches tall, with black hair and a
yellow jacket." At one point police arrested two people in Southgate
Street, one of whom was wearing a yellow jacket, but they were later
found to have nothing to do with the shooting. Shoppers scattered as the
police helicopter hovered over the city centre while the pair were
searched while spreadeagled against the window of Ladbroke's betting
shop.

Passer-by Guy Marsh said: "The man was objecting to being searched and
he was told he was being arrested and was taken away in a police car.
"I was astonished to see this happening in the middle of Gloucester on a
Thursday morning." Police said later: "Though the man answered the
description, we have established the pair were nothing to do with the
earlier incident with the gun." Deputy principal Neil Bromley said: "All
the students on the course will be talking to the police. We believe
some sort of gun was fired through an open window. Nobody was injured."

========================================================================

30th April 1999

Three youths have been jointly charged after yesterday's incident at
Gloscat when shots were fired through a classroom window. Two 16-year-
old juveniles and an 18-year-old have been bailed to appear in court at
a later date to answer firearms and public order offences.

Beauty therapy students have told of the moment when shots, later
established to have been an air pistol, ripped through their classroom.
Scared One said a pellet narrowly missed her. Asking only to be known as
Tina, the 31-year-old said she was doing a pedicure. "It was about
10.50am and it sounded like a stone had hit the window, the pellet shot
past my face very close � had I turned my face a fraction it would have
hit me in the face. "Everyone heard it but it wasn't that noisy because
we had the music on. The lecturer then said she had seen somebody
running off and we realised what had happened. "It was scary because I
was by the window and all the beds in the salon face the window � it
could easily have hit someone. I went into shock in the afternoon."
Another student said: "The police interviewed us but we just thought it
was a bit of excitement and it didn't sink in that someone had shot at
us. "Then later in the afternoon when everyone had been evacuated, we
realised it could have been a lot worse."

Deputy Principal Neil Bromley praised the students, aged between 16 and
35, for their reaction to the incident. "The girls were very sensible,
they behaved very well in evacuating the room and with regard to the
overall situation � they were a credit to themselves." Inspector Jim
McCarthy of Gloucester police said: "Three youths were arrested
following the shooting incident. They have been released on police bail
to appear before magistrates at a later date. All three have been
charged with causing criminal damage with intent to endanger life, being
in possession of a loaded air pistol in a public place and causing an
affray.

========================================================================

College shooting charges
 
Two teenagers charged in connection with a shooting incident at Gloscat
last month have appeared before Gloucester magistrates. Two 16-year-olds
boys, from I#######h and A########, who cannot be identified for legal
reasons, and S#### A##### P#######, 18, of H######## R###, C#######,
were arrested after an incident on April 30. Shots from an air pistol
were fired at the window of a classroom at Gloscat's Brunswick Road
campus. One of the 16-year-olds did not appear in court.

The three are jointly charged with affray, possessing a loaded air
weapon, and committing criminal damage and being reckless as to whether
life was endangered as a result. The case was adjourned until June 24.
All three were granted bail on conditions they do not contact each other
or prosecution witnesses and do not enter the Gloscat premises apart
from as and when required to sit exams, which the court said Gloscat had
agreed to.

========================================================================

25th Jun 1999

Three teenagers arrested after shots were fired into a classroom of
terrified beauty therapy students at a Gloscat college have walked free
from Gloucester magistrates. They accepted cautions for possessing a
loaded air rifle in a public place and other charges against them were
dropped. The trio were arrested and charged with affray, possessing a
loaded air rifle and criminal damage which could have endangered life
after 18 female students, aged between 16-19, were terrified by the
shooting incident on April 29.

It happened in the ground floor beauty salon classroom at the
Gloucestershire College of Art and Technology in Gloucester, when a gun
was thrust in through an open window from outside. Three shots were
allegedly fired at the Park Campus but none of the students were injured
and no damage had been found to the room.  Police flooded the area with
armed and unarmed officers and tracker dogs and the Gloucestershire
force helicopter hovered over the city. They then sealed off the college
building and the surrounding grounds and began an intensive search for
the weapon. 

Later, three youths, S#### P#######, 18, of H######## R###, C#######,
and two 16 year olds, who cannot be named because of their ages, were
arrested. Yesterday the trio, each accompanied by a solicitor, arrived
at the city magistrates court and spoke to Peter Ashby of the Crown
Prosecution Service.

Later, the youths and their lawyers left the building and shortly
afterwards Mr Ashby announced that all the charges had been dropped.
He told the magistrates: "The youths have now been formally cautioned by
a senior police officer for possessing a loaded air rifle in a public
place." All three youths had admitted the offence of possessing a loaded
air rifle and the other charges against them of affray and criminal
damage were withdrawn, he said.

Gloscat bosses are to step up security in response to the firearms
incident. Senior management are considering installing closed circuit
television cameras and student identification cards at its Park Campus
in Cheltenham and Brunswick Road, Gloucester. College spokesman Peter
White said the estates and premises group, student services and student
union have made a series of recommendations to principal Greg Smith
which are now being considered by senior management members. Mr White
said: "There are some major changes to security to be decided upon."

========================================================================

Gloscat gun case: caution �too soft�
 
A trainee beautician who witnessed shots being fired into a Gloscat
classroom thinks three youths should have received harsher punishments.
Two 16-year-olds from A######## and I######## and 18-year-old S####
A#####, of C#######, accepted a police caution for possessing a loaded
airweapon in public.

Peter Ashby, prosecuting, told Gloucester magistrates last week that
charges of criminal damage and affray had been withdrawn.
Ten students were in the health and beauty salon at the Brunswick Road
campus in Gloucester when the incident happened. They were shaken but
unhurt. Armed police moved in and 1,500 students were evacuated from the
building during the drama.

The Gloucester woman involved in the drama, who did not want to be
named, said: "I'm a bit cheesed off. The law seems to be too soft and
people seem to get away with more. They should have at least got a fine
after all the trouble it caused."

Principal Greg Smith said the incident had been the "living nightmare"
all teachers or principals dreaded. Security at the college is to be
tightened up with closed circuit TV and identification passes.
Mr Smith did not want to comment on the court case. 

-- 
Bill Hoath
--
The penalties in the Firearms Act 1968 for airgun offences are
largely anemic, I think the maximum penalty for possession of
a loaded airgun in a public place is something like a L50 fine,
although I think the 1994 Act raised that by a few quid.

However, there are a pretty large range of public order offences
they could have been charged with, I mean imagine for example
they had used a crossbow which are largely unregulated and
actually hit someone.  Attempted murder, aggravated assault
that sort of thing.

Steve.


Cybershooters website: http://www.cybershooters.org

List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___________________________________________________________
T O P I C A  The Email You Want. http://www.topica.com/t/16
Newsletters, Tips and Discussions on Your Favorite Topics

Reply via email to