From: "landsnail", [EMAIL PROTECTED] With regard to the recent vote on Clause 28, having been made even more cynical by this and previous Government actions, as a pistol shooter I find the comments made in defence of the -rights of the individual- in the upper house absolutely astonishing where were all these proponents of the freedoms of the individual when my sport was being destroyed so obviously for nothing but political gain? At least homosexuals and heterosexuals are now finding an equality whereby they can be increasingly shot in equal measure, married or not, by an increasing use of illegal firearms blissfully unaffected by a pointless piece of electioneering... Tim Jeffreys Oxon OX5 1SW -- I was thinking exactly the same thing last night. Here are all these people saying that Section 28 is institutional discrimination, and the arguments in favour of it are scaremongering - yet they were the same people scaremongering about handguns, and they passed a law which doesn't just discriminate against handgun users, it totally outlaws the activity. Apparently homosexuality is okay provided it's not mentioned in school though. Actually I take some of that back, some of the people supporting Section 28 _were_ the same dolts (mostly Conservatives) who supported the handgun ban. Steve. Cybershooters website: http://www.cybershooters.org List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___________________________________________________________ T O P I C A The Email You Want. http://www.topica.com/t/16 Newsletters, Tips and Discussions on Your Favorite Topics
