From: Dave Reay, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>I think that the business of putting a part of our
>common history into a private venture like a book in
>fact tends towards censoring of history for one bad
>reason or another and I think that web publishing of
>history is the better way forward.
Up to a point I agree, but when paranoia bites, who the Hell do we
believe? I tend to trust my uncles writings more than I trust the
"official" version of events, but, when governments come clean and
publish everything on the Web, do we believe them or is it just another
form of "propaganda"? The "spin doctors" are after all no different from
the people that Hitler used to push his version of reallity onto the
German public. Thomas Hamilton was a paedophile that murdered 16
children and 1 teacher, the very same newspaper that blasted target
shooters for being guilty by association with Hamilton and assisted in
the banning of handguns in the U.K. is now "naming and shaming"
paedophiles. Why? because they got the target wrong in the first place,
and another child died at the hands of a pervert as a direct result of
their knee jerk, anti firearms propaganda machine going into hyperdrive.
Will they accept responsibility and own up to having got it wrong? No
Bloody Chance! If they had started their "name and shame" policy just
after Dunblane, then parents would have been more aware of how many
perverts are out there and may have taken more precautions with their
children. I am firmly of the conviction that we were used to divert
attention from the paedophile aspect of "Dunblane" to protect the
guilty! Think about it, why the Hell did McMurdo give Hamilton an F.A.C.
after so many had advised against it? Why have a 100 year exclusion
order on the evidence given to the Cullen inquiry? Why was the media
outcry against handgun shooters when it was patently obvious that
Hamilton murdered those children because he was a paedophile and had
taken the attitude that "if I cannot have them then nobody can"? The
recent revelations of child abuse in a Welsh childrens home pointed to
the possibility that an English "Lord" was involved, later accused by
another abused victim of the "system". These children were being rented
out for perverted sex to "customers" from all over Europe, this is not
an EEC approved trade! So the infrastructure has to be very well
organised and very secretive. Every once in a while it comes unstuck, as
in Belgium, but the first people to try to plug the gap seem to be from
the establishment, again as in Belgium. The judiciary in Belgium tried
to cover it up and the people had to take to the streets in protest, the
main culprit actually escaped from custody but was later recaptured. I
am not sure of the current position regarding this case but it stinks.
Too much of the Dunblane tragedy has had "spin" put on it to vilify
"those evil handgun shooters" while ignoring the paedophile aspect for
me to believe it was nothing more than a diversionary tactic to hide the
real reasons behind it and to protect others that may have become
embroiled in a torrid investigation into the "paedophile connection".
Oops! went into "rant" mode, but I think there is enough in my comments
to generate a little bit of discourse and possibly provide a different
"spin" on the causes of the demise of our sport. Just because "to think
a thing is impossible" does not make it impossible.
--
Dave Reay
Cybershooters website: http://www.cybershooters.org
List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___________________________________________________________
T O P I C A The Email You Want. http://www.topica.com/t/16
Newsletters, Tips and Discussions on Your Favorite Topics
