From: "Tim Jeffreys", [EMAIL PROTECTED] If I interpreted the news correctly this morning, the latest piece of Blairrogance to be issued from the top of the septic tank is to outlaw the currently lawful activities of the blockaders by making fuel supplying a 'special case' (ie. let's remove one of the few effective legal means of active rebellion against tyranny). So it goes something like this: the people aren't happy, and are making their point felt by stopping commercial fuel supplies; this discomforts the government. Given the option, do the government rationally enter discussion, thus defusing the situation, or do they arrogantly attempt to prevent this means of expression of dissaffection, thus bottling it up for a more serious uncontrolled release.... - You *will* be happy in *my* state........or else... Tim I'm going to propose the lemming for prime minister next time -- Pretty much what I thought was when they threatened to do it again in two months time that by then the police will have some plan in place to stop them from doing it again, and that may mean violence. If I was TB I would simply blame Saddam, the convenient scapegoat, for the oil price continuing on up and cut the level of fuel tax. It's so silly, if tax was cut and the price kept going up then people would actually believe the Government's argument. Steve. Cybershooters website: http://www.cybershooters.org List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___________________________________________________________ T O P I C A The Email You Want. http://www.topica.com/t/16 Newsletters, Tips and Discussions on Your Favorite Topics
