From:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

So you're worried about the UN ban on sales of small arms?  Now read on....

US sells half the world's arms exports 

Richard Norton-Taylor 
Friday October 20, 2000 

The west's three permanent members of the UN Security Council account for 80% 
of the world's weapons sales at a time when it is incapable of mounting 
effective peacekeeping operations, according to a report published yesterday 
by a London-based thinktank. 
The report, by the International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS), is 
deeply sceptical about the EU's ability to realise its plans for an 
independent, 60,000-strong rapid-reaction force. 

"European leaders speak of a European defence capacity but have not voted 
[for] the funds to finance it," said the IISS director, John Chipman. 

The US increased its share of the international arms trade last year and now 
accounts for nearly 50% of the $53.4bn (L37bn) annual market, according to 
the IISS publication, the Military Balance. 

Britain came second, selling nearly L7bn worth of weapons, while France was 
third at almost L4.6bn. 

Much of these weapons systems were supplied to the Middle East, the world's 
biggest arms market. Saudi Arabia, the world's largest arms buyer, purchased 
more than L4bn worth of weapons last year. 

Taiwan was the largest arms importer in East Asia. 

Middle Eastern countries spent L42bn on defence last year, says the report, 
which also notes that the Israeli air force had set up its first 
anti-ballistic missile battery some 30 miles south of Tel Aviv. 

The IISS damned the lack of government commitment to international 
peacekeeping. 

"It remains the case that the UN continues to overreach, approving ambitious 
mandates and deploying inadequately supported forces in volatile situations," 
Mr Chipman said. 

"The long-term aim of the UN operation in Sierra Leone is unclear and the 
capacity of the UN to make a sensible contribution to what is a hugely 
unstable situation in the Congo is questionable," he said. 

UN member states were "incapable of producing the sometimes very large 
contingents that a proper operation would require," he said. 

While defence spending increased in most regions of the world, including the 
US, spending by Nato's European members other than Britain and the three new 
entrants - Poland, Hungary, and the Czech Republic - continued to decline. 

"Nato countries in Europe are feeling the strain of what looks like an 
increasingly lengthy commitment in Kosovo," the report said. "Even those with 
all-professional forces are finding they are over-committed in Europe and 
beyond." 

"It remains doubtful whether the Europeans can realise their ambitions for a 
credible 60,000-strong independent force," it adds. 

If the continent is unable to muster a credible independent force, Nato will 
have to remain strongly involved in EU security. "European defence, in all 
but the most trivial of cases, will remain a transatlantic affair," Mr 
Chipman said. 

Britain and France have invested considerable political and diplomatic 
capital in setting up a joint EU military force, which would conduct 
peacekeeping operations without US or Nato involvement 

France wants to cap its six-month stint as EU president at the European 
summit in Nice in December with a firm commitment to set up a credible force 
with at least 60,000 troops. 

100,000 people were killed as a direct result of armed conflicts in the 
year up to August, 60% of them in sub-Saharan Africa, the IISS says. 


Kenneth Pantling


Cybershooters website: http://www.cybershooters.org

List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___________________________________________________________
T O P I C A  The Email You Want. http://www.topica.com/t/16
Newsletters, Tips and Discussions on Your Favorite Topics

Reply via email to