From: "niel fagan", [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Thank you IG, I feel that this is a reasonable answer, but I
>am very puzzled by your reluctance to discuss the selection
>procedure for AFOs.
>Is this not a matter of very legitimate public interest?
>I would be happier if you could either state (or imply) that
>you are not able to answer this question (we will all then
>know what you mean.)
>I have to say that many members of the public (non-shooters)
>seem to be terrified of the armed police units, viewing them
>more as a hazard than as any kind of protection.
>Chris Gould
Sussex were/are putting their faith in phsycometric (can't spell that)
testing (and thats very worrying having been similarly tested by one
employer myself), hants very publicly invited a female probationer to do a
bit of training/shooting on the TV, nothing was seen about any selection
process and very shortly after she and her partner (also a police officer)
were suspended while being investigated for insurance fraud, IIRC that all
ended up in court..
Cybershooters website: http://www.cybershooters.org
List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___________________________________________________________
T O P I C A http://www.topica.com/t/17
Newsletters, Tips and Discussions on Your Favorite Topics
