From: Jeremy Peter Howells, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Agreed we've got to fight what they say and what they are
trying to do - especially as so much of it is lies or
distortions of the truth.
However, when they field Mick North we must counterpoint
the arguments that he makes rationally and with emphasis
on the fact that if the laws current in 1996 were enforced
Dunblane shouldn't have happened with a legal gun in the
hands of Thomas Hamilton as his FAC should have been
revoked well before that date.
I think it's section 6.2 of the report that has the most
damning sentences - a quick quote of that is usually
enough to leave the uninformed open mouthed in disbelief.
Especially when you ask them to check it for themselves.
Regards
Jerry
Cybershooters website: http://www.cybershooters.org
List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___________________________________________________________
T O P I C A http://www.topica.com/t/17
Newsletters, Tips and Discussions on Your Favorite Topics
