From: Mike Taylor, [EMAIL PROTECTED] >It may or may not be a good example, but that is neither here nor there. >It's met with a deafening silence by the people who advocate NO controls, >even if you personally are not one of them. >Not one response has been made to this by those advocates! > Steady on IG. You have your own silences from time to time. You said that George Harrison could have used (ie had the right to use) a legally held shotgun for self defence and no jury would convict. Possibly true, but you failed to answer my question on whether he would continue to be a certificate holder after the acquittal. I suspect the answer is *no*. Which means you can use this method of defence only once. Having shown a propensity to use a legally held weapon for defence on one occasion seems to be sufficient grounds for access to legally held weapons to be denied. That's not much of a right. Use it once and lose it for good. What would be the response of your own licensing department? Cybershooters website: http://www.cybershooters.org List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___________________________________________________________ T O P I C A http://www.topica.com/t/17 Newsletters, Tips and Discussions on Your Favorite Topics
