In Bush, NRA Sees White House Access
 
By John Mintz
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, May 4, 2000; Page A01 

The National Rifle Association's second-ranking officer boasted at a closed 
meeting of NRA members earlier this year that if Republican nominee George W. 
Bush wins in November, "we'll have . . . a president where we work out of 
their office." 

First Vice President Kayne Robinson, who is in line to succeed NRA President 
Charlton Heston, added that the NRA enjoys "unbelievably friendly relations" 
with the Texas governor. Robinson, who is also chairman of the Iowa 
Republican Party, made the comments Feb. 17 before 300 members in Los 
Angeles. He also described 2000 as "a critical election" in which Bush's 
success would ensure "a Supreme Court that will back us to the hilt."

Bush's presidential campaign denied he is that close to the NRA, citing 
instances in which he has disagreed with the group. "Neither the NRA nor any 
special interest sets the governor's agenda," said Bush spokesman Scott 
McClellan. "Governor Bush sets his agenda based on his priorities and 
principles."

Gun control groups say Bush has rarely strayed from NRA orthodoxy and for 
years has aggressively promoted its political platform. The NRA said it is 
proud of its ties to Bush.

"Kayne has a good relationship with the governor from their proximity for 
long periods in Iowa, and we at the NRA have had very good relations with 
George Bush over his entire public life," said chief NRA lobbyist James 
Baker. "Bush is very supportive of the rights of law-abiding gun owners, and 
he's followed his words with deeds."

Handgun Control Inc., a group that promotes firearms legislation, is 
featuring a tape of Robinson's comments in a nationwide television ad 
campaign starting today.

Firearms are emerging as one of the hottest issues in the 2000 campaign. Vice 
President Gore is a staunch advocate of gun control measures and a bitter 
critic of the NRA. Bush has taken some steps recently to distance himself 
from the group, even as the NRA seems to be making some headway in accusing 
the Clinton administration of dragging its feet in prosecuting firearms 
offenses.

At the same time, the NRA is becoming more openly aligned with the GOP this 
election season than ever before. In 1999 and 2000, the NRA has given the 
Republican Party $537,500 in "soft money" donations, which can be given to 
political parties in unlimited amounts. In the 1996 cycle, the NRA gave 
$87,725 in soft money to the GOP, and in 1997-98 it gave the Republicans 
$350,000. It donated no soft money to the Democrats in all those years.

NRA officials say they will spend more this election season than ever 
before--$12 million to $15 million, and possibly more, on ads, political 
donations, direct mail and phone banks. The investment is leading to rapid 
growth in NRA membership, they said--up 1 million, to 3.5 million.

Robinson was one of several NRA leaders who offered frank assessments of 
their political strategy at the Los Angeles meeting, which was videotaped. 
Handgun Control gave a copy of the tape to The Washington Post.

The NRA officials had traveled to California in part to speak with 
disgruntled members who believe that the NRA's Virginia headquarters hasn't 
been sufficiently aggressive or politically adept.

Their anger boiled over last year, after the NRA suffered a loss in 
California when Gov. Gray Davis (D) signed four gun control bills into law. 
Now, some NRA members there are trying to get an initiative onto the November 
ballot to roll back those laws. But NRA leaders, fearing that such an 
initiative could divert energy from other electoral priorities and likely 
would lose anyway, aren't helping on the ballot measure--which has angered 
some members there.

During the February visit, the NRA officials assured members that they will 
eventually help overturn the new gun laws and that NRA officials are aware of 
the high political stakes this year.

"We're facing a critical election," Robinson said. "All three branches of the 
federal government are at stake, first time in a long time. . . . There will 
be four, maybe five justices of the Supreme Court appointed in the first term 
of the next president. . . . If Gore is the president, every one of those 
people will be rabidly anti-gun.

"If we win, we'll have a Supreme Court that will back us to the hilt," added 
Robinson, a former police official in Des Moines. "If we win, we'll have a 
president, with at least one of the people that's running, a president where 
we work out of their office. Unbelievably friendly relations."

Robinson didn't mention Bush's name, but NRA officials acknowledge he was 
referring to the Texas governor. The two men grew close over the past year, 
when Bush spent long stretches of time campaigning in Iowa, where Robinson, 
as GOP head, oversaw the party's crucial caucuses, NRA officials said.

Robinson also said that if the GOP loses its razor-thin control of the House, 
it will seriously injure the NRA. "Every one of those [now-friendly] 
committees could be run by people that not only dislike us, but hate us," he 
said.

But a few congressional Democrats are fond of the NRA, and the group's 
leaders said it walks a tightrope trying to please both these Democrats and 
the NRA's main GOP constituency. "NRA doesn't mean National Republican 
Association," California NRA lobbyist Ed Worley told the gathering. "I get in 
a lot of trouble for saying that."

Relations between Bush and the NRA have been warm for years. Running for 
governor in 1994, he promised to sign a bill that had been vetoed by the 
Democratic incumbent, Ann Richards, allowing Texans to carry concealed 
weapons. The NRA praised Bush then as a "strong pro-gun candidate," and after 
he won, its magazine hailed the event with the headline "Election '94: Gun 
Owners Win Big!"

Soon, top NRA lobbyists joined Bush as he signed the "concealed-carry" law, a 
top NRA priority nationwide. Last year the group applauded him for signing 
legislation banning Texas cities from suing gun manufacturers, and it praised 
his stands on such issues as gun shows and background checks of gun buyers. 
The NRA's Web site commends Bush lavishly and contains smiling pictures of 
him with links to his official biography.

In a recent mailing, NRA Executive Vice President Wayne LaPierre urged 
members to send attached postcards to the two presidential candidates. The 
one to Bush said, "I want to thank you for your support of the Second 
Amendment and your tough stand against violent criminals." The Gore card 
said, "I strongly oppose your policy of allowing violent criminals to go 
free."

But Bush also supports several ideas that the NRA opposes--such as raising 
the age for handgun possession from 18 to 21 and banning the import of 
high-capacity ammunition magazines. Bush has at times sought to separate 
himself further from the NRA. After LaPierre told reporters in March that 
Clinton has "blood on his hands" for supposedly failing to prosecute 
criminals with guns, Bush said LaPierre "may have gone too far."

But Bush aides say he agrees with the NRA on the underlying point. "He 
appreciates the support of all Americans who want to reverse the Clinton-Gore 
administration's lax enforcement of gun laws," a Bush spokesman said.

At the Los Angeles meeting, LaPierre expressed confidence that the GOP-led 
Congress will do what the NRA wants--even though the group briefly stumbled 
last year. In the aftermath of last year's Columbine High School massacre, in 
which 12 students and a teacher were shot dead, the Senate humbled the NRA by 
voting to close a loophole under which firearms purchases at gun shows are 
exempt from background checks. Gore cast the crucial 51st vote, and gun 
control forces were exultant.

"They thought we were dead," LaPierre said--and then the NRA swung into 
action. "We gave them a Normandy invasion in the House," he said. "I'd walk 
into House offices . . . and congressmen would say, 'I got 19,000 calls at my 
office; I'm with you.' . . . We ended up with no gun control passing in the 
Congress last year."

At the meeting, NRA board member Manny Fernandez said he is confident the 
group will prevail, and not only because of its growth.

"We have the people, and in the end," he said to thunderous applause and 
laughter, "we have the guns."

  -------[Cybershooters contacts]--------

  Editor: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  Website & subscription info: www.cybershooters.org

Reply via email to