From: nick royall, [EMAIL PROTECTED] A compendium of thoughts on California's interpretation of product liability laws for firearms. 1. Guns are obviously toys because they should have features to prevent injury by children to themselves so therefore cars and tin cans should be banned or made of thicker metal because they too would fail safety tests as toys. 2. If ballistic tests are to be applied to firearms and ammunition then every household should have its water supply tested upon installation or upon house sale for toxicity and the results kept by the police and checked every time someone flushes the toilet (discharge in a public place?). 3. Ammunition, as a consumable should have its ingredients listed by chemical name on the packet and if forced to shoot someone you should receive your money back if it proves unsatisfactory and fails to kill them. 4. Matchboxes should be equipped with childproof locks. 5. Guns do what they are designed to do, like air bags in cars, they are "waiting to work" systems. They should be built into every house in the event of an emergency. 6. There should be a 24 hr waiting period and a background check on all purchases of petrol and household cleaning products in case someone decides to drink bleach or commit a vehicle crime. 7. Coca cola should pick up the bill for all dentistry in California. 8. Potatoes should be banned due to the toxic nature of the plant and seeds, greengrocers to carry records of sales etc. 9. Owners of swimming pools should remove the water to prevent accidental drownings. 10. Politicians should face public nuicance suits for forcing people to live in conditions injurious to their health, ie California under their rule. 11. Traffic lights fail to stop accidents so they should be removed from public places. any other like with like comparisons? Nick Why me? -------[Cybershooters contacts]-------- Editor: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Website & subscription info: www.cybershooters.org
