Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Tue, Dec 04, 2001 at 02:56:01AM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote: > >>Charles Wilson wrote: >>It's paragraph #4 that I'm asking about. Basically, does the old BSD >>license satisfy the "open source" exception of cygwin's license? >> > > What does http://www.opensource.org/osd.html say?
Well, it SEEMS like BSD+advert is okay, but I was looking for some official confirmation. It is odd that http://www.opensource.org/licenses/bsd-license.html doesn't mention whether the old license was osd-compliant or not. --Chuck
