Sorry. I should've identified the package in the original email. The one I had planned on supporting was http://www.gnu.org/gnulist/production/whois.html. It's always seemed to work well for me. I wasn't aware the bw.org version, though. Any good reason to pick that one versus the gnu package?
Mark > -----Original Message----- > From: Gerrit P. Haase [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 10:23 AM > To: Jonathan Kamens > Cc: Mark Bradshaw; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: whois package > > > Hallo Jonathan, > > 2001-12-07 16:22:05, du schriebst: > > >> Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2001 09:55:02 +0100 > >> From: "Gerrit P. Haase" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> > >> Which whois do you want to maintain? > >> http://www.gnu.org/gnulist/production/jwhois.html > >> http://www.gnu.org/gnulist/production/whois.html > > > Don't forget bw-whois, which is my favorite: http://whois.bw.org/ > > Yes, great, I didn't know this, I just looked at gnu.org and found > the other two. > > Gerrit > -- > convey Information Systems GmbH > http://www.convey.de/ > > Vitalisstra�e 326-328 > Gerrit P. Haase D-50933 K�ln > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fon: ++49 > 221 6903922 >
