----- Original Message ----- From: "Christopher Faylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 12:04 PM Subject: Re: has anyone tried latest setup.exe from cvs ?
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 10:52:11AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote: > > > >----- Original Message ----- > >From: "Gary R. Van Sickle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>i.e., that have no "version:" lines in them (what is such an entry > >>supposed to mean, or is this actually a upset bug?). The parser then > >>never creates a > > > >Chris, do you consider version: to be mandatory for setup.ini files? > > > >setup.html doesn't specify (AFAICT) whether version: is optional or > >mandatory. If the decision hasn't been made, I'd prefer mandatory. > > It's optional for setup.exe, certainly. There are a few packages for > which there is no version: info. I think I nuked one of them yesterday, > though. Ah. I'll make setup.exe robust again - at the moment it dies if there is no version: entry for a package in setup.ini. Thanks, Rob
