> -----Original Message----- > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Earnie Boyd > "Morrison, John" wrote: > > Personally, I'd rather identify the apps which _arn't_ GNU. I > didn't know > > that the (current) version of which for cygwin wasn't the GNU > version. This > > ment that I kept wondering why it wasn't in 'sync' with the 'latest' GNU > > one. > > > > Uhm, "Use the source, Luke" (tm). Alternatively for this particular > case you could also search the cygwin-announce archive for such hints. > I know that Corinna said that it was here own version of which when she > announced it.
:) yeah, I know I could use the source, but at the time I had no interest in it, wasn't subscribed to any of the mailing lists and used Cygwin as a complete (still am to a fair degree) newbie. I just assumed (yea 'ass U me') that it was the GNU one. Maybe all the packages ought to state where they originated? J.
