Corinna, 2002-01-09 12:50:02, du schriebst:
> On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 09:16:12AM +0100, Stipe Tolj wrote: >> Users may have to include /usr/libexec to their PATH, due to the fact >> that libhttpd.dll resides there. Should we move at least that core >> library to /usr/bin to have it in PATH like the other cygfoo.dlls? > Shouldn't that be /usr/bin/cyghttpd.dll? > ^^^ It is the same like it is with perl or python. These packages doesn't use libtool and to change the name would need some additional patches in a lot of build related files which would blow up the patch. But I'll look what I can do regarding the next perl release. Gerrit -- =^..^=
