>It doesn't seem like this package should be named tetex-beta-20001218. >Unless it is a modification of the sources from more than a year >ago, it should be renamed to a more recent date.
>cgf The orignal name of main source is `tetex-beta-20001218': what I mean is that the date does correspond to the date of the source. The latest one is `tetex-beta-20011202' which available from CTAN: I guess I have to build it, but this operation should take some time and the 'list' asked me to rebuid the current cygwin package before that this new source was available. Hence the name `tetex-beta-20001218-2' for the latest cygwin tetex package. May I renamed the cygwin tetex package `tetex-betat-20001218-20020112-1' ? Thanks, Jerome
