On Sun, Jan 13, 2002 at 10:12:48AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote: >If you want to be able to have both apoache 1.3 and 2 installed >concurrently, then that is the only valid reason to use an underscore - >and the result should look like > >apache_1-1.3.22-3
Actually, the setup.exe code seems to equate '_' and '-' the same way. Unfortunately, I don't think that 'upset' is quite as forgiving but that's not a permanent problem, of course. So that means that the above package name would still be "apache" if I am reading things correctly. cgf >Rob > >=== >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Stipe Tolj" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2002 5:13 AM >Subject: Re: [ANN] apache_1.3.22-2 > > >> Corinna Vinschen schrieb: >> > >> > On Sat, Jan 12, 2002 at 06:53:43PM +0100, Stipe Tolj wrote: >> > > No I don't think so. I'll change the /etc path thing and >re-package to >> > > apache_1.3.22-3, now! >> > >> > apache-1.3.22-3, please! >> > >> > A dash, no underscore. >> >> Apache distributions do use a underscore, BTW. I know this will make >> problems with setup.exe I guess, so I'll change the tarballs to use a >> dash instead. >> >> Stipe >> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> ------------------------------------------------------------------- >> Wapme Systems AG >> >> M?nsterstr. 248 >> 40470 D?sseldorf >> >> Tel: +49-211-74845-0 >> Fax: +49-211-74845-299 >> >> E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de >> ------------------------------------------------------------------- >> wapme.net - wherever you are >> -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Red Hat, Inc. http://sources.redhat.com/ http://www.redhat.com/
