Robert Collins wrote:
>>Okay, I've renamed the devel package: >> >>libtool-devel-20010531-6 >> > > that should be libtool_devel-20010531-6 shouldn't it? > (devel is a flavour and thus part of the name). > > I _think_ that the current upset and setup.exe logic actually starts at > the right and owrks left, so that teh '-''d name will appear in setup > correctly, but I don't think we should rely on this behaviour. Correct -- it does work from R to L. If we cannot depend on this behavior, then we must rename the following packages: autoconf-devel autoconf-stable automake-devel automake-stable tetex-beta Renaming is a bad thing...are you SURE we shouldn't rely on current behavior? --Chuck
