> Thanks for the patch. I applied it to my local > sandbox but I > was somewhat surprised about the behaviour since > > cygpath -D -A > > has another result as > > cygpath -A -D > > which is not what a user expects. The options > should be scanned > and after the scanning they should be evaluated > (right after the > switch statement). Would you mind to change your > patch accordingly? > > Corinna > Yeah, I figured that since the (unpatched) cygpath's current behaviour requires switches to precede other options that this was expected:
$ cygpath -Ww /c/WINNT $ cygpath -wW C:\WINNT Should I try and change that, too? __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Send FREE video emails in Yahoo! Mail! http://promo.yahoo.com/videomail/
