Corinna Vinschen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm not at all familar with tex so I'd like to ask somebody else > to look into these packages. The setup.hint files are looking ok to > me. Did you pack using the correct paths as given on > http://cygwin.com/setup.html#package_contents ?
Yes, I believe so. > Another point: Aren't we still waiting for tetex-beta-20001218-3 > leaving `test' state or did I miss something? Yes it seems that way. In this case that's maybe a bit odd, because tetex-beta-20001218-1 has a number of problems. > IMO it doesn't make much sense to have these texmf packages in > `curr' state if they depend on a `test' package. Ok, so maybe adding some test: tags would not hurt. In any case, tetex-beta-20001218-3 and texmf-*' tags should be (kept) in sync. Jan. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org
