=== ----- Original Message ----- From: "Gary R. Van Sickle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > I just built the latest setup.exe. It looks really nice. And, I see that > > clickable categories are working! > > Are they ever! And did you catch the "replace files in use" feature? Yeah it > makes you reboot, but still, pretty sweet.
*Bow*. I still ain't heard boo from any win9x users. Anyone that can lay hand on a 9x machine and test this *before* we release the updated version, would be doing me a favour. > I keep meaning to suggest the same thing, and maybe even lines like you get on > most such expanding list control thingies. But I think Rob is rolling his own > here instead of using the ListView common control (which isn't available on a > stock 95 machine AFAIK), so lines might be asking a bit much. But I'd think > that at a minimum, simply adding a toggling +/- to the front of each category > string wouldn't be too traumatic. Rob? Listviews aren't hierarchical. Treeviews suck. So C++ to the rescue. I may wrap the end result in window messages at some point, but not being a win32 windowing API wizzzard thats a low priority. As for requirements, 95 +IE 4 is the minimum, and that wouldn't be a showstopper IMO (but the functionality is :}) > > Hopefully, that won't translate into it being completely incomprehensible > > for everyone on the cygwin@cygwin list. > > Well, we are working hard on the mindreading mode.... Shh! Be veri veri quite. I'm hunting rabbit. Rob
