On Mon, Mar 18, 2002 at 02:56:30AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 2:39 AM > >>Actually, I don't think there is any reason to have a default >>/etc/profile for ash. I think it is really only useful for bash. The >>current /etc/profile seems to assume that it is running under bash. >>However, it really should be more ash friendly since ash reads >>/etc/profile. Either that or maybe ash should read something other >>than /etc/profile. > >Well, my interest begins and ends with the file creation being moved >somewhere sensible. Simply running setup should not create >/etc/profile any more than installing sed.
Yep. Agreed. Apparently the interest of everyone else here ends a lot earlier than that. cgf
