On Thu, Apr 25, 2002 at 01:32:47PM +0200, Ralf Habacker wrote: >> Hi Danny, >> >> > Yes, this looks very nice, but does it works against current CVS? >> This patch is a minor change, which could be reviewed easy, but I have got >> trouble using the current cvs head (binutils 2-12.xx) release from >> sources.redhat.com.> >> It produces undefined symbols compiling dll/apps and that means cygwin support >> seems to be broken. Because I hadn't enough time to check this, .... > >I've taken a look on the cvs archive to verify this. Are I'm right using the >cygnus_cvs_20020108_pre tag ?
Why are you using a tag at all? Your patches should be against the binutils trunk. cgf
