> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 1:32 AM

> Hmm.  Dueling "you do the work" scenarios.
> 
> Why not just release an interim version of setup that 
> silently ignores the third field?  That's what we've done in the past.

I planned to, but then, without realising it, I'd done the code :}. It
seemed like to much effort to strip it out, just to ensure more
testing...

Rob

Reply via email to