> -----Original Message----- > From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 1:32 AM > Hmm. Dueling "you do the work" scenarios. > > Why not just release an interim version of setup that > silently ignores the third field? That's what we've done in the past. I planned to, but then, without realising it, I'd done the code :}. It seemed like to much effort to strip it out, just to ensure more testing... Rob
- MD5 support Robert Collins
- Re: MD5 support Christopher Faylor
- RE: MD5 support Robert Collins
- Re: MD5 support Christopher Faylor
- Re: MD5 support Robert Collins
- Re: MD5 support Christopher Faylor
- Re: MD5 support Christopher Faylor
- RE: MD5 support Robert Collins
- Re: MD5 support Christopher Faylor
- RE: MD5 support Robert Collins
- Re: MD5 support Christopher Faylor
- RE: MD5 support Robert Collins
- Re: MD5 support Christopher Faylor
- RE: MD5 support Robert Collins
- Re: MD5 support Christopher Faylor
