> > >>They're based on "4 august 2000" version by Dave Raggett, >> >> >Sorry. I was just referring to the fact that there is no discernible >release schedule for the cygwin dll. > > You're right. In tidy is not the schedule itself that is missing (that is normal IMHO), the real missing thing is a release planning, with some testing, a beta/test and a "release" or the such. I guess they are considering current releases "alpha" even if they are improvement of a "stable" release.
-- Lapo 'Raist' Luchini [EMAIL PROTECTED] (PGP & X.509 keys available) http://www.lapo.it (ICQ UIN: 529796)
