Robert Collins wrote: >----- Original Message ----- >From: "David A. Cobb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 8:11 AM >Subject: [Bug] SETUP.EXE regression -- proposing going backward again > > > > >>I see in SETUP.EXE vsn 2.249.2.5 that setup is back to proposing to >>over-write "test" versions with the "older" current revision. IIRC, we >>all agreed once upon a time that this ain't right. >> >>Specifically: GCC 3.1.1-2 proposed replacement is 2.95.3-5 >> Guile 1.5.6-2 .... 1.4-2 >> Lilypond 1.5.65-1 .... 1.4.14jcn4-1 >> >> >> > >Gcc 3.1.1-2 is marked as test. We agreed that setup would never try to >uninstall a version, but we didn't agree on management of the test versions. > >Rob > I'll sift thru the pile, but I believe we agreed that setup would never recommend rolling a version-number backward. All of these do that.
-- David A. Cobb, Software Engineer, Public Access Advocate "By God's Grace I am a Christian man, by my actions a great sinner." -- The Way of a Pilgrim; R. M. French, tr. Life is too short to tolerate crappy software. .
