Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > That's swell. However, I'm not going to be moving. I don't want a > whatever.sh script showing up in my sources.
Yes, I understand. There was quite a thread about this... > So, I guess this is another option. If you submit it as an option, > I'll apply it. That's nice, but I'm convinced now that this is not the Right Thing (tm) to do, but rather something like: > As is mentioned elsewhere, this also implies that mknetrel will be > released as a package for the unwashed masses and I hadn't realized that > I'd signed on for that. :-) >I guess we can cross that bridge when it runs us over. Yes, I believe so too. It was just that I was thinking too much Method2 -- good. whatever.sh -- must comply. Greetings, Jan. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org
