Christopher Faylor wrote: > [Cleaning out my mailbox] > On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 06:50:16AM -0400, Nicholas Wourms wrote: > >>Now you can link gcc against libiconv ;-). >> > > FWIW, I hope I have done this. I added the libraries in the hopes that > the gcc configury would find it. How do we determine if it worked?
Well, it's obviously not linked in dynamically (which is probably good -- I think we want gcc to be static, except for cygwin1.dll). However, begin a dumb american, I can't think of anyway to test it since I never really learned how to deal with i8n issues (toldja I wasn't the best guy to maintain libiconv...) I wonder if our japanese users could test this out for us? Otherwise, I think you're going to have to look thru your build log (you did pipe build output to a logfile, right? <g>) --Chuck
