> Also, it should probably be "aclocal && libtoolize --force --copy && 
> automake --gnu --copy --add-missing --force-missing && autoconf" but 
> that's just me.
>
>> This time it uses no patch but a simple "aclocal && libtoolize 
>> --force" in the "conf" phase. 
>
OK, I'll do some search to understand the exact purpose of your "longer" 
command and why it is more general and why aclocal&libtoolize is 
"enough" for this package to compile... I guess this will lead me to 
understand more basis about automake/autoconf/libtool... they still look 
like a useful "black box" to me ^_^

I guess I can't wait until you finish the FAQ that Nicholas was talking 
about.

-- 
Lapo 'Raist' Luchini
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (PGP & X.509 keys available)
http://www.lapo.it (ICQ UIN: 529796)


Reply via email to