John Morrison wrote: > > There's now a 1.0-2. Added a little more functionality and > lots more comments. > > I've not recieved much feedback wrt this. Come on folks - > what do you think? >
I haven't looked at the package but > sdesc: "Core common files needed for correct operation of cygwin" > ldesc: "Core common files needed for correct operation of cygwin" I don't believe this to be the correct description of the package. > category: base > Shouldn't there be a dependency on the Cygwin package? Earnie.
