--- Chris January <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I've updated the procps package. > > > > -You still have a /usr/bin/kill.exe (which conflicts with cygwin's). > > It appears to be a copy of your skill.exe. Also the kill.1 and ps.1 > > manpages conflict with cygwin-doc. > > Just a suggestion, since you already patch the Makefile to get > > kill->kill.exe and ps->ps.exe, why not patch the Makefile to create > > kill->prockill.exe, etc.? That way no mixups. > > > This is really an instance of two packages providing different versions of > the same program. I changed the name of the executables in the binary > package to avoid the conflict, but if someone is building from source, it is > really up to them how they resolve it. They may choose to put the binaries > in a different directory with their original names, for example. > I have however renamed the manual pages and kill.exe in the binary package - > that was an oversight on my part.
Well, I personally like to be able to do a 'make install' and it be exactly like the binary package. But, you're the packager. This looks good now and has my vote (though I don't believe it needs any more.) Thanks for putting this together, I especially missed 'free'. __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New DSL Internet Access from SBC & Yahoo! http://sbc.yahoo.com
