Hi Jan, please, could you also consider anything mensioned in http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2002-09/msg00929.html ?
Regards, J�rg > -----Original Message----- > From: Jan Nieuwenhuizen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Saturday, September 21, 2002 2:20 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: tetex-20020911-1 > > > > This new tetex release should fix all tetex bugs (cygwin/packaging) > reported lately. Also, packaging has been cleaned-up. This means > that the split between tetex-base and tetex-extra has changed a bit. > > Please upload; however, please be careful with the external-source, > there apparently was a conflict last time with older > tetex-beta-20001218-* and texmf-*-20000804-2, but I didn't get to see > a usable bug report. > > Maybe it would be best to drop those old ones along with the upgrade > helper packages: (tetex-beta*, texmf*). This would mean non-automatic > upgrading for people that still have the old tetex installed, but > should save us quite some headaches. And we have a mean attitute to > users anyway, right ;-) > > Greetings, > Jan. > >
