Re: [RFC] gpg signed packages [Was: unofficial packages]

[Nicholas Wourms]

>>Just my two pence worth ;)
> 
> 
> Trust me,
> there's plenty of time before this could go ahead. Setup.exe has core
> model changes needed to support it.

I'd give two quid if setup.exe would compile properly with 
g++-3.2!

Cheers,
Nicholas