Yann Crausaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hey Max, > > I've just applied the patch you provided at 09:34, and my 'weird' bug > doesn't appeare anymore !
Either due to random coincidence, or some complex interaction between my change and the bug you were experiencing. I wrote that patch before I read your bug report. > How could I have kwown that the cvs version > of setup had to be patched ? The cvs HEAD is, by definition, the continuosly evolving. Expecting it to work _always_ is unrealistic. > No info on > http://sources.redhat.com/cygwin-apps/setup.html... Chris's reply answered this perfectly. > Should I have > parsed the messages of the few last week on the ML, searching for > eventual patches ? Of course it is a good idea to keep current on what else is happening with setup, but in this case, it wouldn't have helped, because you were the first person to report this bug. > It sound a bit odd, doesn't it ? Bugs happen sometimes. What's odd about that? Max.
