Max Bowsher wrote:
DSA are 'newer' and lack of a little bug in calculating the fingerprint (in old RSA keys it is possible to forge a fingerprint just moving bits from the exponent to the base, see in it.sci.crypt faq for more infos). Though RSA keys created today doesn't have the same problem too, I think.Any preference RSA or DSA? I've never managed to find anything saying whether one is better than the other or not.
Another pro of DH/DSA key is the capacity to have separaetd subkeys, which can expire indipendently.
From the security standpoint there is no reason to choose one or the other AFAIK.
Today I would suggest DH/DSA.
--
Lapo 'Raist' Luchini
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (PGP & X.509 keys available)
http://www.lapo.it (ICQ UIN: 529796)
